Friday, January 09, 2004
Gettin' Paid Like It's 2001
In December of 2000, Rich Aurilia signed a three year deal that paid him bank for the time. In 2001 Aurilia made $3.5 million and went out and posted a .941 OPS. It was a career high by far and away for Aurilia and put him just on the outskirts of the elite shortstops in the game (his OPS trailed ARod in that season, but finished ahead of both Jeter and Nomar).
However in the past two years, injuries of all sorts took their toll, limiting Aurilia's playing time and power. Now 32, Aurilia hits the market at the absolutely wrong time. The Great Budget Shrinkage of 2004 is well underway. The only offer Aurilia received that was near market value was from the Detroit Tigers--not quite the winning atmosphere the ultra-competitive Aurilia was seeking.
So Aurilia signed a one-year deal with the Mariners today for $3.5 million. It's nowhere near as galling as the Robbie Alomar surrender to the D'Backs, and you can't really call $3.5m large a disaster. But it certainly does not bode well for a gimpy, mid-30s player with questionable offensive and defensive abilities.
In December of 2000, Rich Aurilia signed a three year deal that paid him bank for the time. In 2001 Aurilia made $3.5 million and went out and posted a .941 OPS. It was a career high by far and away for Aurilia and put him just on the outskirts of the elite shortstops in the game (his OPS trailed ARod in that season, but finished ahead of both Jeter and Nomar).
However in the past two years, injuries of all sorts took their toll, limiting Aurilia's playing time and power. Now 32, Aurilia hits the market at the absolutely wrong time. The Great Budget Shrinkage of 2004 is well underway. The only offer Aurilia received that was near market value was from the Detroit Tigers--not quite the winning atmosphere the ultra-competitive Aurilia was seeking.
So Aurilia signed a one-year deal with the Mariners today for $3.5 million. It's nowhere near as galling as the Robbie Alomar surrender to the D'Backs, and you can't really call $3.5m large a disaster. But it certainly does not bode well for a gimpy, mid-30s player with questionable offensive and defensive abilities.
Wednesday, January 07, 2004
Cheap Diamondback
Sure, Robbie Alomar stats have fallen off considerably. But is he really only worth $650,000? That's how much cash the D'backs will shill out to the future Hall of Famer for 2004. Of course they are paying Alomar another $350k. In 2009. Interest fee. How cheap is this? Well, if Robbie's buddy Carlos Baerga gets 200 at bats, he'll earn $1.2 million in 2004 -- 45 percent more than Robbie. Todd Walker, who unlike Alomar has some value at the plate, will earn $1.75 millon in 2004. And he turned down another half million from the Indians. I don't know what this says about Robbie, but it must mean something.
Sure, Robbie Alomar stats have fallen off considerably. But is he really only worth $650,000? That's how much cash the D'backs will shill out to the future Hall of Famer for 2004. Of course they are paying Alomar another $350k. In 2009. Interest fee. How cheap is this? Well, if Robbie's buddy Carlos Baerga gets 200 at bats, he'll earn $1.2 million in 2004 -- 45 percent more than Robbie. Todd Walker, who unlike Alomar has some value at the plate, will earn $1.75 millon in 2004. And he turned down another half million from the Indians. I don't know what this says about Robbie, but it must mean something.
Tuesday, January 06, 2004
"In the end, the deal collapsed under the weight of too much money, by far the most involved in a proposed player transaction. Rodriguez could not buy his way to freedom, no matter how willing he was to sacrifice millions to play for the Red Sox."
--from Gordon Edes's Boston Globe report on the failed Alex Rodriguez deal
--from Gordon Edes's Boston Globe report on the failed Alex Rodriguez deal
Monday, January 05, 2004
The Liar and the Gambler
"We haven't seen the book. Until we read the book, there's nothing to comment on."
-Bud Selig to The AP about Pete Rose's admission that he bet on baseball.
Does anyone in their right mind believe that Selig isn't closely choreographing Pete's every step this week. Don't try to bullshit us, Bud. You want Pete back because the fans like him, for some reason that we haven't figured out yet.
"We haven't seen the book. Until we read the book, there's nothing to comment on."
-Bud Selig to The AP about Pete Rose's admission that he bet on baseball.
Does anyone in their right mind believe that Selig isn't closely choreographing Pete's every step this week. Don't try to bullshit us, Bud. You want Pete back because the fans like him, for some reason that we haven't figured out yet.
